Legal Opinion

United States v. Grey Water

District Court, D. North Dakota

Decided January 31, 2005No. C2-04-145PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Memorandum Opinion and Order Granting Motion to Suppress Evidence and Denying Motion to Dismiss Indictment

ERICKSON, District Judge.

Before the Court is a motion to suppress statements obtained in violation of Miranda and a motion to dismiss on the grounds that 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(3) is unconstitutional as applied to Defendant (doc. # 12). The United States has filed a brief in opposition. A hearing was held on January 13, 2005, during which these issues were taken under advisement.

Summary of Decision

The Court finds Defendant was in custody for purposes of Miranda when he was handcuffed and…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Berkemer v. McCartySupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. California v. BehelerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. New York v. QuarlesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States v. MayDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2006
  2. United States v. KeysDistrict Court, D. North Dakota · 2005
  3. United States v. LindseyDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2007
  4. United States v. MinnifieldDistrict Court, D. North Dakota · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API