Legal Opinion

United States v. May

District Court, D. Minnesota

Decided July 10, 2006No. Criminal 06-08 (06), (07) (RHK/RLE)PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

KYLE, District Judge.

In a June 12, 2006, Report and Recommendation, Chief Magistrate Judge Raymond L. Erickson has recommended that (1) Defendant May’s Motion to Suppress Statements be granted in part; (2) Defendant May’s Motion to Suppress Evidence as a Result of Search and Seizure be denied; and Defendant Veith’s Motion to Suppress Statements be denied.

Before the Court are the Objections to the Report and Recommendation filed by both Defendants May and Veith. The de novo review of the Report and Recommendation and Defendants’ Objections thereto, satisfies the undersigned that Judge…

2Cases cited120 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Edwards v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981

115 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. El-Ghazzawy v. BerthiaumeDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2010
  2. Tracy v. NeubergerDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2012
  3. Henry Orlando Brown v. State of MississippiCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API