Legal Opinion

Hamilton v. Amwar Petroleum Co., Inc.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided January 31, 1989No. 65857PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HARGRAVE, Vice Chief Justice.

The Hamiltons brought this action alleging an oil and gas lease covering their mineral interest in the SW/4 of Section 17, T10N, R12W of their interest in minerals had expired under its express terms. The Hamiltons sought a decree cancelling the lease and quieting their title in the mineral estate. Plaintiffs also sought actual damages and punitive damages for willful and malicious refusal on the part of the defendant to release the lease.

The cancellation issue was tried to the court and the court found that the lease had terminated. The actual and punitive damage…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Sunray DX Oil Company v. BrownSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1970
  2. Keener Oil & Gas Co. v. StewartSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  3. Slocum v. Phillips Petroleum Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1983
  4. Ward v. Mid-West & Gulf Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  5. Smith v. JohnstonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1978

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Graham v. KeuchelSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
  2. Voiles v. Santa Fe Minerals, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1996
  3. Estrada v. PORT CITY PROPERTIES, INC.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2011
  4. HALL v. GALMORSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2018
  5. Wagoner v. BennettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1991

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API