Harley-Davidson, Inc. v. Toomey
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
Defendants Harley-Davidson, Inc., and AMF, Inc. appeal from a $1,000,000 judgment based on a jury verdict obtained against them in Mobile County Circuit Court by plaintiff Bobby Dale Toomey. (Because their interests and arguments are identical, these two defendants shall be referred to simply as "Harley-Davidson" or "the defendant.") Toomey sued under the Alabama Extended Manufacturer's Liability Doctrine, claiming defective design of a Harley-Davidson motorcycle helmet. We affirm.
Bobby Toomey purchased a Harley-Davidson 1200 motorcycle and the "full face" X-100 helmet at issue in October…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Hammond v. City of GadsdenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1986
- Casrell v. Altec Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1976
- Sears, Roebuck & Co., Inc. v. Haven Hills Farm, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1981
- Roan v. SmithSupreme Court of Alabama · 1961
- MacKintosh Co. v. WellsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Spain v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2003
- Allen v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1994
- Dennis v. American Honda Motor Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1991
- Williams v. Delta Intern. MacHinery Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1993
- Volkswagen of America, Inc. v. MarinelliSupreme Court of Alabama · 1993
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.