Legal Opinion

Ferrellgas, Inc. v. Edward A. Smith, P.C.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided May 9, 2006No. WD 65554PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Per curiam

The trial court granted summary judgment in favor of Respondents Edward A. Smith, P.C., et al., because the claims brought against them by Appellant Fer-rellgas, Inc. were barred by the applicable statute of limitations. Ferrellgas appeals. The judgment is affirmed.

Factual and Procedural Background

This appeal arises from a lawsuit filed by Ferrellgas, Inc. against Edward A. Smith, P.C. and Smith, Gill, Fisher & Butts, P.C., (“Smith, Gill”), alleging legal malpractice. The allegations relate to Smith, Gill’s representation of Ferrellgas in a California lawsuit, Hightower v. Buckeye Gas…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. ITT Commercial Finance Corp. v. Mid-America Marine Supply Corp.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1993
  2. Klemme v. BestSupreme Court of Missouri · 1997
  3. Elmore v. Owens-Illinois, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1984
  4. Thompson Ex Rel. Thompson v. CrawfordSupreme Court of Missouri · 1992
  5. Dixon v. ShaftonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1983

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Great Plains Trust Co. v. Union Pacific RailroadCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2007
  2. Johnson v. Allstate Indemnity Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2009
  3. WHEELER EX REL. WHEELER v. PhenixMissouri Court of Appeals · 2011
  4. Paula Diane Robinson v. City of Kansas City, MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 2014
  5. Wright v. CampbellMissouri Court of Appeals · 2009

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API