Legal Opinion

Second Injury Trust Fund v. Stanton

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided September 7, 1988No. Civ. 6442PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

INGRAM, Judge.

The defendant, Second Injury Trust Fund, appeals from an adverse decision by the trial court in favor of the plaintiff, Daniel McCleave. McCleave filed a petition for writ of mandamus against the Fund to collect interest on a lump sum attorney’s fee previously awarded him in a workmen’s compensation case. The trial court held that interest on an attorney’s fee may be assessed against the Fund under § 8-8-10, Code 1975 (1984 Repl.Vol.), which provides for the payment of interest on money judgments.

Before we can determine whether an attorney’s fee accrues interest, we must first *58de…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Baggett Transp. Co. v. HolderfieldSupreme Court of Alabama · 1953
  2. Nason v. JonesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1965
  3. Freeman v. Blue Mountain IndustriesCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1981
  4. Second Injury Trust Fund v. StantonCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1987

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Ex Parte StantonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  2. Second Injury Trust Fund v. StantonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API