Legal Opinion
Justin v. United States
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided March 24, 2009No. Civil Action 07-02334 (HHK)PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
HENRY H. KENNEDY, JR., District Judge.
In a rambling prolix complaint, Rodney K. Justin, proceeding pro se, asserts various causes of action against the United States, the Department of the Treasury, the Internal Revenue Service, the Department of Justice, three identified individuals in their official capacity and five unidentified individuals. 1 Justin charges that the United States unlawfully issued administrative summonses and unlawfully seeks to prosecute him. He also contends that several provisions of the Internal Revenue Code (“IRC”), 26 U.S.C. §§ 1 et seq., are…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Enochs v. Williams Packing & Navigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Lindsey v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2006
- Holt v. DavidsonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2006
- Frank A. Bowers, Jr. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Z Street, Inc. v. KoskinenDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Kaufman v. Internal Revenue ServiceDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Kaufman v. Internal Revenue ServiceDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Z Street v. ShulmanDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Z Street v. ShulmanDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014