Gill v. Poe & Brown of Georgia, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Barnes, Judge.
Poe & Brown of Georgia, Inc. (“Poe & Brown”) sued Bobby Gregg Gill for an injunction and damages, claiming that Gill violated a non-solicitation agreement. Poe & Brown moved for partial summary judgment in its favor on the issue of whether the non-solicitation agreement was enforceable; Gill opposed the motion and also moved for summary judgment in his favor. The trial court granted Poe & Brown’s motion and denied Gill’s motion. Gill appeals, claiming the trial court erred because it (1) implicitly found that the non-solicitation agreement could be assigned to Poe & Brown…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- W. R. Grace & Co. v. MouyalSupreme Court of Georgia · 1992
- Maddox v. Southern Engineering Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1998
- Swanson v. KirbySupreme Court of Georgia · 1896
- U3S Corp. of America v. ParkerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1991
- Reardigan v. Shaw Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1999
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Wachovia Insurance Services, Inc. v. FallonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2009
- Palmer & Cay of Georgia, Inc. v. Lockton Companies, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 2006
- Palmer & Cay of Georgia, Inc. v. Lockton Companies, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2005
- Palmer & Cay of Georgia, Inc. v. Lockton Companies, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 2006
- Palmer & Cay of Georgia, Inc. v. Lockton Companies, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 2006