Legal Opinion

Gill v. Poe & Brown of Georgia, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided November 3, 1999No. A99A0912PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Barnes, Judge.

Poe & Brown of Georgia, Inc. (“Poe & Brown”) sued Bobby Gregg Gill for an injunction and damages, claiming that Gill violated a non-solicitation agreement. Poe & Brown moved for partial summary judgment in its favor on the issue of whether the non-solicitation agreement was enforceable; Gill opposed the motion and also moved for summary judgment in his favor. The trial court granted Poe & Brown’s motion and denied Gill’s motion. Gill appeals, claiming the trial court erred because it (1) implicitly found that the non-solicitation agreement could be assigned to Poe & Brown…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. W. R. Grace & Co. v. MouyalSupreme Court of Georgia · 1992
  2. Maddox v. Southern Engineering Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1998
  3. Swanson v. KirbySupreme Court of Georgia · 1896
  4. U3S Corp. of America v. ParkerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1991
  5. Reardigan v. Shaw Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1999

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Wachovia Insurance Services, Inc. v. FallonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2009
  2. Palmer & Cay of Georgia, Inc. v. Lockton Companies, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 2006
  3. Palmer & Cay of Georgia, Inc. v. Lockton Companies, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2005
  4. Palmer & Cay of Georgia, Inc. v. Lockton Companies, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 2006
  5. Palmer & Cay of Georgia, Inc. v. Lockton Companies, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API