Legal Opinion
U3S Corp. of America v. Parker
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided December 5, 1991No. A91A0805PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Pope, Judge.
U3S Corporation of America d/b/a Must Software International (“Must”) purchased a computer software product line known as Nomad from D&B Computing Services, Inc. (“D&B”). Subsequently, Must hired former D&B employees Doris Bihm and Joe Oliver to serve as professional services consultants to its customers, but did not hire former D&B employee Larry Parker. Parker established Diversified Business Systems, Inc. (“Diversified”) and Bihm and Oliver, while still employed by Must, each invested $10,000 to become shareholders of Diversified. First Bihm and then Oliver left Must to work…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Yost v. TorokSupreme Court of Georgia · 1986
- Howard Schultz & Associates of Southeast, Inc. v. BroniecSupreme Court of Georgia · 1977
- Durham v. Stand-By Labor of Georgia, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1973
- Nasco, Inc. v. GimbertSupreme Court of Georgia · 1977
- Guernsey Petroleum Corp. v. Data General Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1987
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Allen v. Hub Cap Heaven, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
- Insight Technology, Inc. v. FREIGHTCHECK, LLCCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2006
- Habif, Arogeti & Wynne, P.C. v. BaggettCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1998
- Physician Specialists in Anesthesia, P.C. v. MacNeillCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2000
- Time Warner Entertainment Co. v. Six Flags Over Georgia, LLCCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2000
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.