Rapoport v. Tesoro Alaska Petroleum Co.
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
COMPTON, Justice.
The sole issue in this case is whether the trial court erred in holding that the superi- or court’s decision in Rapoport v. Tesoro Alaska Petroleum Co., No. 4FA-87-1176, aff'd, 790 P.2d 1374 (Alaska 1990) {Rapo-port I) collaterally estops Rapoport from asserting the same excuse which failed to justify setting aside the default judgment against him in that ease to justify setting aside the default judgment in this case.
I. FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS
Both parties agree on the operative facts. In 1986 Rapoport, as a shareholder in RRFG Investments, Ltd., a closely held…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Briggs v. State, Department of Public Safety, Division of Motor VehiclesAlaska Supreme Court · 1987
- Murray v. FeightAlaska Supreme Court · 1987
- Pennington v. SnowAlaska Supreme Court · 1970
- Calhoun v. GreeningAlaska Supreme Court · 1981
- Gregor v. HodgesAlaska Supreme Court · 1980
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Blake J. v. State of Alaska, Department of Health & Social Services, Office of Children's Services Philip Kaufman John Does 1-10 and Alexa J.Alaska Supreme Court · 2024
- Martin N. v. State, Department of Health & Social Services, Division of Family & Youth ServicesAlaska Supreme Court · 2003
- Borg-Warner Corp. v. Avco Corp.Alaska Supreme Court · 1993
- Johnson v. Alaska State Department of Fish & GameAlaska Supreme Court · 1991
- Smith v. MaloufMississippi Supreme Court · 1992
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.