Evans v. MOFFAT
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Dissent
Dissenting Opinion by
Woodside, J.:
I dissent on the ground that the Supreme Court has held as a matter of law that the identical evidence of liability presented in this case was insufficient to support a finding against the defendants, and that the case so holding has not been reversed.
In 1951 twenty-six cases were brought against Bobert Y. Moffat et al. in which all of the plaintiffs claimed damages for injuries to their respective home's allegedly caused by noxious gas emanating from the mine refuse dumps maintained by the defendants.
One of the actions, Waschak v. Moffat, was used as a test…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Mahnich v. Southern Steamship Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Burtt WillSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
- Heisler v. Thomas Colliery Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
- Waschak v. MoffatSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
- Evans v. MoffatSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.