Hardy v. Daum
Supreme Court of Iowa
1Opinion of the Court
Kintzinger. J.
Appellant alleges that she is the owner of an undivided three-sixths; that her husband, J. H. Hardy, is the owner of an undivided one-sixth; and that the defendant is the owner of an undivided two-sixths, of the real estate in question. Appellee contends that the Hardys own four-ninths of the property and Mrs. Daum five-ninths, subject to a lien in favor of the Hardys for two-thirds of the $3,500 advanced by them to purchase an outstanding one-third interest in the property.
Prior to 1932 the farm belonged, in equal shares, to the plaintiff, Minnie Hardy, to her sister, the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Johnston v. JicklingSupreme Court of Iowa · 1909
- Kelley v. KelleySupreme Court of Iowa · 1920
- Ratigan v. RatiganSupreme Court of Iowa · 1917
- Schurz v. SchurzSupreme Court of Iowa · 1910
- Hayes v. DeanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1917
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Pap v. PapSupreme Court of Iowa · 1955
- Butler v. ButlerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1962
- Ross v. RossSupreme Court of Iowa · 1964
- York v. YorkSupreme Court of Iowa · 1947