Legal Opinion

Hardy v. Daum

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided March 12, 1935No. 42824PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Kintzinger. J.

Appellant alleges that she is the owner of an undivided three-sixths; that her husband, J. H. Hardy, is the owner of an undivided one-sixth; and that the defendant is the owner of an undivided two-sixths, of the real estate in question. Appellee contends that the Hardys own four-ninths of the property and Mrs. Daum five-ninths, subject to a lien in favor of the Hardys for two-thirds of the $3,500 advanced by them to purchase an outstanding one-third interest in the property.

Prior to 1932 the farm belonged, in equal shares, to the plaintiff, Minnie Hardy, to her sister, the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Johnston v. JicklingSupreme Court of Iowa · 1909
  2. Kelley v. KelleySupreme Court of Iowa · 1920
  3. Ratigan v. RatiganSupreme Court of Iowa · 1917
  4. Schurz v. SchurzSupreme Court of Iowa · 1910
  5. Hayes v. DeanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1917

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Pap v. PapSupreme Court of Iowa · 1955
  2. Butler v. ButlerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1962
  3. Ross v. RossSupreme Court of Iowa · 1964
  4. York v. YorkSupreme Court of Iowa · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API