Legal Opinion

Lacey Mark Sivak v. Stephen Kenyon and Judge David C. Nye

District Court, D. Idaho

Decided February 4, 2026No. 1:25-cv-00663Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF IDAHO LACEY MARK SIVAK, Case No. 1:25-cv-00663-DCN Plaintiff, INITIAL REVIEW ORDER BY v. SCREENING JUDGE STEPHEN KENYON and JUDGE DAVID C. NYE, Defendants. The Clerk of Court conditionally filed Plaintiff Lacey Mark Sivak’s “Criminal Complaint” because of Plaintiff’s status as an inmate. A “conditional filing” means that a plaintiff must obtain authorization from the Court to proceed. Upon screening, the Court must dismiss claims that are frivolous or malicious, fail to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, or seek monetary relief…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  4. Joseph Jackson, II v. State of Arizona (Unknown) Terry, Deputy Acting Warden (Unknown) Avenenti, Deputy WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
  5. Edward G. Eldridge v. Sherman BlockCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API