Legal Opinion

In re the Marriage of Chester

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 14, 2001No. 9310-69058; CA A103117PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWollheim, J.

Husband appeals a judgment modifying a judgment of dissolution of marriage. We hold that the trial court lacked subject matter jurisdiction. Accordingly, we vacate the judgment.

The relevant facts are as follows: Husband and wife were married in Oregon in 1982. In 1993, the parties’ marriage was dissolved in Montana. That final judgment of dissolution awarded the parties joint legal custody of their two children, with wife appointed as the primary residential custodian. Shortly after the dissolution, wife relocated to Oregon, registered the Montana dissolution judgment and moved to modify that…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. In Re Stephanie M.California Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Williams v. WilliamsIndiana Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Wink v. MarshallOregon Supreme Court · 1964
  4. Baty v. SlaterCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
  5. Matter of Marriage of NickersonOregon Supreme Court · 1984

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2023
  2. Shepard v. Lopez-BarcenasCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
  3. In re the Marriage of BossCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
  4. People of Michigan v. Gregory Carl WashingtonMichigan Supreme Court · 2021
  5. People of Michigan v. Gregory Carl WashingtonMichigan Supreme Court · 2021

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API