Legal Opinion

State v. Keenan

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided March 21, 1989No. TC C8612-36601; CA A43996; SC S35311Published

1Opinion of the Court

771 P.2d 244 (1989)

307 Or. 515

STATE of Oregon, Plaintiff (below),

v.

Charles M. KEENAN, Defendant (below).

In re Contempt of Nan WALLER.

State of Oregon, Respondent On Review,

v.

Nan Waller, Petitioner On Review.

TC C8612-36601; CA A43996; SC S35311.

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Argued and Submitted September 8, 1988.

Decided March 21, 1989.

Lawrence Matasar of Hoffman, Matasar & Glaeser, Portland, argued the cause and filed the petition for petitioner on review.

Jonathan H. Fussner, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem, argued the cause for respondent on review. With him on the response brief were Dave Frohnmayer, Atty.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. People v. MeredithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
  2. In Re Advisory Opinion No. 544 of the New Jersey Supreme Court Advisory Committee on Professional EthicsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1986
  3. State v. CrenshawOregon Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Seventh Elect Church v. RogersWashington Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Matter of HanksOregon Supreme Court · 1981

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API