Elliott v. Ballentine
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtHedbictc, J.
The appellants bring forward on this appeal two assignments of error: (1) Did the court err in holding that there was no defect of parties and causes and (2) did the court err in holding that the complaint alleged a genuine controversy under the Declaratory Judgment Act?
G.S. 1-254 provides that any person who has an interest “under a deed, will, written contract or other writings constituting a contract, or whose rights, status or other legal relations are affected . . .” may have any question of construction determined and obtain a declaration of rights, status, or other legal relations…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Lide v. MearsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
- Town of Tryon v. Duke Power Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
- Carolina Power & Light Co. v. IseleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
- Walker v. PhelpsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
- Newman MacHine Company v. NewmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1969
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- North Carolina Consumers Power, Inc. v. Duke Power Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
- Kirkman v. KirkmanCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979