Legal Opinion
Jordan v. Sandwell, Inc.
District Court, W.D. Virginia
Decided January 31, 2002No. 7:99CV00713, 7:99CV00724PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
TURK, District Judge.
These two cases, which involve a plaintiff allegedly injured when superheated water erupted from a tower at a paper mill and scorched his back, were consolidated for pretrial proceedings. The two defendants, Sandwell Engineering, Inc. (“Sand-well”) and U.S. Filter Corporation (“U.S. Filter”) 1 have moved for summary judgment against the two plaintiffs, Clarence Jordan and Westvaco Corporation (“West-vaco”). After carefully considering the parties’ filings (which were voluminous, to put it mildly) and oral arguments, the Court rules on the motions…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Hung P. Nguyen v. Cna CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1995
- Cape Henry Towers, Inc. v. National Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1985
- Cooper Industries, Inc. v. MelendezSupreme Court of Virginia · 2000
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Kohl's Department Stores, Inc. v. Target Stores, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2003
- Colgan Air, Inc. v. Raytheon Aircraft Co.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2005
- In Re: In the Matter of the Fort Totten Metrorail Cases Arising Out of the Events of June 22, 2009District Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- In Re Fort Totten Metrorail CasesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Department of Professional and Occupational Regulation, etc. v. Best Buy Stores, LPCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2014
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.