Legal Opinion

Pilgrim v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Insurance

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided September 22, 1997No. 38549-6-IPublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWebster, J.

This case concerns the cooperation clause in an insurance contract and the legislature’s recent efforts to diminish fraud in the making of insurance claims. Here, the Pilgrims, who were in the process of selling their home, reported a theft of approximately $15,000 in personal property from their home to the police; the investigating officer *714found no evidence of forced entry. When filing an itemized claim with State Farm Insurance, the Pilgrims claimed approximately $148,000 in stolen personal property. When analyzing the claim, State Farm questioned whether the Pilgrims had sufficient income…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. PUD DISTRICT NO. 1, KLICKITAT COUNTY v. International Insurance Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Oregon Automobile Insurance v. SalzbergWashington Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Canron, Inc. v. Federal InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1996
  4. Mutual of Enumclaw Insurance v. CoxWashington Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Martin Fine v. Bellefonte Underwriters Insurance Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Tran v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Tran v. State Farm Fire and Cas. Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Pilgrim v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1997
  4. Staples v. Allstate InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 2013
  5. Rymsha v. Trust InsuranceMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2001

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API