Legal Opinion

United States v. Peterson

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided June 22, 1953No. 2594PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam :

Accused was found guilty by general court-martial of one larceny in violation of Article 121, Uniform Code of Military Justice,' 50 USC § 715, and three' forgeries and one utterance of a forged instrument, all in violation of Article 123, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 50 USC § 717, following his plea of not guilty. Air Force reviewing authorities have upheld the findings and the sentence. The case is before the Court on petition for review. Article 67(b) (3), Uniform Code of Military Justice, 50 USC § 654.

The law officer in instructing the court-martial on…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. ClayUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1951
  2. United States v. KeithUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1952
  3. United States v. CromartieUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1952
  4. United States v. WrightUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1952

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. United States v. TamasUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1955
  2. United States v. McCollumUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1982
  3. United States v. MayUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1954
  4. United States v. StewardUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1955
  5. United States v. UptonU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1980

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API