Legal Opinion

McCormack v. Murray

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided June 30, 1937No. 29991PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPaine, J.

In this case an attack is made upon a revivor of a deficiency judgment, on the ground that the original deficiency judgment was void.

On August 20, 1914, a petition for the foreclosure of a mortgage against the north 33 feet of a certain residence lot in Hanscom Place, Omaha, Nebraska, was filed. On January 11, 1915, the decree was entered, and on December' 4, 1915, a motion was filed, setting out that the plaintiff was entitled to a deficiency judgment for the difference between $4,568.88, which was the amount of the original decree, with interest and costs of $54.80, less the amount of…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Fidelity Finance Co. v. WestfallNebraska Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Dryden v. ParrotteNebraska Supreme Court · 1901
  3. First Trust Co. v. Glendale Realty Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Arnold v. HawleyNebraska Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Solt v. AndersonNebraska Supreme Court · 1902

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Rodríguez v. AlbizuSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1954
  2. Rodríguez v. AlbizuSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API