Goldstein v. National Fire Insurance
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Walla Walla county, Mills, J., entered December 18, 1917, upon findings in favor of the defendant, in an action on contract, tried to the court.
1Opinion of the CourtChadwick, C. J.
Appellants brought this action to recover upon a fire insurance policy issued by the respondent company. The policy is in form what is called the “New York Standard Form,” in our insurance code. It contained the usual covenants, stipulations, and conditions, among others, that the insured would in case of fire give immediate notice of any loss, followed by the usual stipulations with reference to time, inventories and care of the property pending a settlement, and,
“(90) In the event of disagreement as to the amount of loss the same shall, as above provided, be ascertained by two competent and…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Oppenheim v. Fireman's Fund InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1912
- Davis v. Atlas Assurance Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1896
- Kuck v. Citizens' InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1916
- Davis v. Northwestern Mutual Fire Ass'nWashington Supreme Court · 1907
- Elhart v. Pacific Mutual Life InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1907
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Keesling v. Western Fire InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1974
- Grandview Inland Fruit Co. v. Hartford Fire InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1937
- Virginia Foods of Bluefield, Va., Inc. v. DaileyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1977
- Oregon Mortgage Co. v. Hartford Fire InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1922
- Schwier v. Atlas Assurance Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1924
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.