Colma Vegetable Assn. v. Bonetti
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
MUBPHEY, J., pro tem.
This is an appeal upon the judgment-roll alone. The facts, as developed by the findings, are substantially as follows: The defendant G. Bonetti & Company is a copartnership of which G. Bonetti is a member and has been a member during all the time covered by the transaction involved in this litigation; that there were other members of said copartnership; that the defendant copartnership became a member of the Colma Vegetable Association, the plaintiff in this action, in May, 1922; that the plaintiff association, a nonprofit corporation, was at all the times mentioned in…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- City of Pasadena v. StimsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Abeel v. ClarkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- National Union Fire Insurance v. WanbergSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Pignaz v. BurnettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Poultry Producers of Southern California, Inc. v. BarlowCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- H. J. McGrath Co. v. WisnerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1947
- Lincoln v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
- Lincoln v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
- Simons Brick Co. v. Eagle Indemnity Co.California Court of Appeal · 1930