Legal Opinion

Colma Vegetable Assn. v. Bonetti

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 18, 1928No. Docket Nos. 5598, 6232PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MUBPHEY, J., pro tem.

This is an appeal upon the judgment-roll alone. The facts, as developed by the findings, are substantially as follows: The defendant G. Bonetti & Company is a copartnership of which G. Bonetti is a member and has been a member during all the time covered by the transaction involved in this litigation; that there were other members of said copartnership; that the defendant copartnership became a member of the Colma Vegetable Association, the plaintiff in this action, in May, 1922; that the plaintiff association, a nonprofit corporation, was at all the times mentioned in…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. City of Pasadena v. StimsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Abeel v. ClarkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  3. National Union Fire Insurance v. WanbergSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  4. Pignaz v. BurnettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  5. Poultry Producers of Southern California, Inc. v. BarlowCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. H. J. McGrath Co. v. WisnerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1947
  2. Lincoln v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Lincoln v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Simons Brick Co. v. Eagle Indemnity Co.California Court of Appeal · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API