Legal Opinion
Egenera, Inc. v. Cisco Sys., Inc.
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided May 22, 2019No. CIVIL ACTION NO. 16-11613-RGSPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FINDINGS OF FACT AND RULINGS OF LAW AFTER A BENCH TRIAL ON INVENTORSHIP
STEARNS, D.J.
*112The court held a three-day bench trial confined to a single issue: Is Peter Schulter an inventor of United States Patent No. 7,231,430 (the '430 patent) ? Based on the credible testimony and exhibits offered at trial, and the stipulations of the parties, I make the following findings of fact.
FINDINGS OF FACT
Background
1. Plaintiff Egenera, Inc., is a Delaware corporation with its principal place of business in Boxborough, Massachusetts. Stipulated Facts (SF) ¶ 2.
2. On September 6, 2000, Egenera made an…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Commil United States, LLC v. Cisco Sys., Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2015
- Ethicon, Inc. And Inbae Yoon, M.D. v. United States Surgical Corporation and Young Jae ChoiCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- Burroughs Wellcome Co. v. Barr Laboratories, Inc., and Novopharm, Inc. And Novopharm, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994
- Eli Lilly and Company v. Aradigm Corporation, Defendant-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
- In Re: VerhoefCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2018
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Egenera, Inc. v. Cisco Systems, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2021
- Egenera, Inc. v. Cisco Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2020