Legal Opinion
In Re: Verhoef
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided May 3, 2018No. 2017-1976PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Lourie, Circuit Judge.
Jeff H. VerHoef ("VerHoef") appeals from the decision of the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (the "Board") affirming the examiner's rejection of all claims of VerHoef's pending application 13/328,201 (the "'201 application") as unpatentable under 35 U.S.C. § 102 (f) (2006). Ex parte VerHoef , No. 2015-005270, 2017 WL 745052 (P.T.A.B. Feb. 23, 2017) (" Decision "). Because the Board correctly concluded that VerHoef did not solely invent the claimed subject matter of the '201 application on which he claimed sole inventorship, we affirm.
BACKGROUND
VerHoef filed the '201…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- In Re Robert J. Gartside and Richard C. NortonCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2000
- Pannu v. Iolab Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- Burroughs Wellcome Co. v. Barr Laboratories, Inc., and Novopharm, Inc. And Novopharm, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994
- Jeffrey R. Sewall and Ronald G. Walters v. Ronald G. WaltersCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Duncan Parking Technologies v. Ips Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2019
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute v. Ono Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2020
- Blue Gentian, LLC v. Tristar Products, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2023
- Plastipak Packaging, Inc. v. Premium Waters, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2022
- Dana-Farber Cancer Inst., Inc. v. Ono Pharm. Co.District Court, District of Columbia · 2019
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.