Legal Opinion
Wolgin v. Magic Marker Corp.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided April 9, 1979No. Civ. A. No. 77-3155PublishedCited by 50 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LUONGO, District Judge.
Plaintiffs in this securities fraud case are investors who purchased Magic Marker Corporation common stock during a period of alleged price manipulation. In their second consolidated amended complaint, plaintiffs allege that over a period of nearly two years, some forty individual and corporate defendants took part in a wide-ranging conspiracy to artificially inflate the price of Magic Marker stock. Plaintiffs assert claims for damages under sections 10(b) and 20 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, 15 U.S.C. §§ 78j(b), 78t (1976), the rules and regulations…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Ernst & Ernst v. HochfelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Santa Fe Industries, Inc. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Blackie v. BarrackCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
- Reuben J. Katz, on Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated v. Carte Blanche CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1974
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by50 opinions
- Wanda Jenkins v. Raymark Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1986
- Dura-Bilt Corp. v. Chase Manhattan Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1981
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 98,777, 11 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 781 Chemetron Corporation, Cross-Appellant v. Business Funds, Inc., Cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
- In re LTV Securities LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1980
- Vitiello v. CicconiDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1984
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.