Legal Opinion

McHugh v. Jones

New York Court of Appeals

Decided July 24, 1940PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

Prima facie evidence of ineligibility of one of the members of the jury to sit as a juror was disclosed by statements made outside the jury room and having no relation to the deliberations of the jury. The disclosures were sufficient, even though contained in affidavits of jurors, to require the court to make inquiry as to their truth for the purpose of determining the question of eligibility. (People v. Leonti, 262 N. Y. 256.)

The order should be affirmed, with costs, and the question certified answered in the negative.

Lehman, Ch. J., Loughran, Finch, Rippey, Sears, Lewis and Conway, JJ.,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. People v. LeontiNew York Court of Appeals · 1933

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. People v. DurlingNew York Court of Appeals · 1952
  2. People v. WhitmoreNew York Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Samuels v. American Cyanamid Co.New York Supreme Court · 1985
  4. People v. MoralesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
  5. Glessner v. Lafayette Post No. 37 of American LegionNew York Supreme Court · 1966

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API