Legal Opinion
United States v. George Alberto Monreal
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided August 28, 2002No. 01-50203PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SILVERMAN, Circuit Judge.
George Monreal appeals the district court’s denial of his motion to enforce a 1993 oral plea agreement that was entered in the Central District of California. Mon-real contends that the government breach ed the plea agreement by indicting him on similar charges in 1994 in the Southern District of Iowa. We conclude that the district court properly dismissed Monreal’s motion for lack of jurisdiction, regardless of whether it is construed as an attack on the Iowa or the California conviction.
I. Factual Background
On March 9, 1993, George Monreal was indicted in the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- United States v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Hernandez v. CampbellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Calderon v. United States District CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- United States v. Michael Lee HarveyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1986
- Anant Kumar Tripati v. Gary L. HenmanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Liza Brown v. Susan E. PooleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- United States v. Eileen CrowellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Sean Wright v. State of AlaskaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2022
- Alires v. CrowtherCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- United States v. All Assets Held at Bank Julius Baer & Co.District Court, District of Columbia · 2016
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.