Legal Opinion

United States v. Eileen Crowell

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided June 30, 2004No. 03-30041PublishedCited by 47 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BYBEE, Circuit Judge:

This case presents the question whether a person convicted of a crime may collaterally attack her conviction by moving to expunge the records of her conviction. We hold that she cannot, and we affirm the judgment of the district court.

FACTS

In 1990, a federal grand jury indicted the defendant, Eileen Crowell, on six counts, based on allegations of conspiracy to manufacture, distribute and possess with intent to distribute live marijuana plants, see 18 U.S.C: § 2; 21 U.S.C. §§ 841, 846, and the filing of false tax returns for 1986, 1987, and 1988, see 26 U.S.C. § 7206. The…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Heck v. HumphreySupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Davis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. United States v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  5. Dickerson v. New Banner Institute, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by47 opinions

  1. United States v. CareyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2010
  2. United States v. Michael MeyerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2006
  3. United States v. Mancinas-FloresCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  4. United States v. NorburyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
  5. United States v. David C. RowlandsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2006

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API