Legal Opinion

Hampton v. Trimble

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided February 22, 1995No. CA 14544PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Frederick N. Young, Judge.

Kathleen Hepler Hampton is appealing from a grant of summary judgment to defendants finding that she was not entitled to benefits under the Ohio Workers’ Compensation Act. Because we find, construing the evidence most strongly in favor of Hampton, that reasonable minds could reach different conclusions from the facts as presented, the summary judgment is not appropriate here and will therefore be reversed.

The underlying facts are not in dispute and are succinctly set forth in the opinion of the trial court, as follows:

“Hampton was employed as a home health care nurse…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Harless v. Willis Day Warehousing Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Fisher v. MayfieldOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Leibreich v. A.J. Refrigeration, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Duke v. Sanymetal Products Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1972
  5. Sebek v. Cleveland Graphite Bronze Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1947

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Ruckman v. Cubby Drilling, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Cleveland Elec. Illum. Co. v. ClevelandOhio Court of Appeals · 2020
  3. Carrick v. Riser Foods, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1996
  4. Moss v. ConradOhio Court of Appeals · 2004
  5. Friebel v. Visiting Nurse Assn. of Mid-OhioOhio Court of Appeals · 2013

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API