Legal Opinion

Evans v. Chase Bank USA, N.A.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided February 22, 2008No. 06-15212PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM *

Plaintiffs appeal the district court’s Rule 12(b)(6) dismissal of their complaint against Chase Bank. Plaintiffs assert that Chase Bank violates the Truth in Lending Act and Delaware and California law by imposing, without additional notice, interest rate increases retroactive to the start of billing cycles after card members default as defined in the agreements. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and review de novo. Orkin v. Taylor, 487 F.3d 734, 738 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 128 S.Ct. 491, 169 L.Ed.2d 340 (2007). We affirm.

Plaintiffs assert that the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Andrew J. Orkin F. Mark Orkin Sarah-Rose Josepha Adler A. Heinrich Zille v. Elizabeth TaylorCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
  2. Rose v. Chase Bank USA, N.A.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. McCoy v. Chase Manhattan Bank, USA, National Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  2. Swanson v. Bank of America, NACourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
  3. Swanson v. Bank of America, N.A.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
  4. New Mexico ex rel. King v. Capital One Bank (USA) N.A.District Court, D. New Mexico · 2013
  5. In re Capital One Bank Credit Card Interest Rate LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 2014

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API