Legal Opinion

Swanson v. Bank of America, NA

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided April 24, 2009No. 08-3322PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EASTERBROOK, Chief Judge.

Our opinion in this appeal, released on March 19, 2009, held that issuers of credit cards may increase interest rates at the start of a billing cycle, without giving separate notice to borrowers, when contracts with the borrowers authorize the rate increase. We rejected Laura Swanson’s argument that 12 C.F.R. § 226.9(c) requires at least 15 days’ notice before a rate of interest may change. While our opinion was at the printer, a panel of the ninth circuit came to a contrary conclusion. McCoy v. Chase Manhattan Bank, USA, N.A., 559 F.3d 963 (9th Cir.2009). Swanson has…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ford Motor Credit Co. v. MilhollinSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Anderson Bros. Ford v. ValenciaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. McCoy v. Chase Manhattan Bank, USA, National Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  4. Evans v. Chase Bank USA, N.A.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Chase Bank USA, N. A. v. McCoySupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  2. United States v. MontagueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2023
  3. Asta, L.L.C. v. Telezygology, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2009
  4. R.R. Donnelley & Sons Co. v. Vanguard Transportation Systems, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2009
  5. Shaner v. Chase Bank USA, N.A.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2009

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API