Griffin v. Health Systems Management, Inc.
District Court, N.D. Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
AMENDED1 ORDER
Amy Totenberg, United States District Judge
This matter is before the Court on Defendant Health Systems Management, Inc.’s (“HSM”) Motion to Dismiss [Doc. 5]. For the following reasons, the Motion is GRANTED.
1. BACKGROUND FACTS
At this stage, the facts alleged in the Complaint are accepted as true. Plaintiff Griffin operates a solo dermatology practice called Intown Dermatology. (Compl. ¶ 3.) As a condition of service, Plaintiff requires her patients to assign their health insurance benefits to her. (Id.)
In April and May of 2013, Plaintiff performed two surgical procedures on…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Watt v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Venture Associates Corporation, a Tennessee Corporation v. Zenith Data Systems Corporation, a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
- Central States, Southeast and Southwest Areas Pension Fund, a Pension Trust v. Gerber Truck Service, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- GVB MD, LLC v. BLUE CROSS AND BLUE SHIELD OF FLORIDA, INC.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2019
- Griffin v. Humana Employers Health Plan of Georgia, Inc.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 2016
- Griffin v. Sevatec, Inc.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 2016
- Griffin v. Sevatec, Inc.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 2016