Legal Opinion
Ruman v. Eskew
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided March 15, 1976No. 3-875A167PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHoffman, J.
Plaintiff-appellant Elizabeth Ruman (Ru-man) sought a preliminary injunction in the trial court to enable her to try out for, and if competent, to play on the varsity tennis team of Munster High School. The trial court refused to issue such a preliminary injunction, and Ruman subsequently perfected this interlocutory appeal.
Ruman was excluded from participation with the Munster High School varsity tennis team through the operation of Rule 9, § 10 of the Constitution and Bylaws of the Indiana High School Athletic Association (hereinafter referred to as IHSAA). The first issue which Ruman…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Haas v. South Bend Community School CorporationIndiana Supreme Court · 1972
- Joslyn N. Williams and Robert L. Bostick v. L. Quincy Mumford, Librarian of CongressCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1975
- International Ass'n of MacHinists & Aerospace Workers v. McGill Manufacturing Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1975
- Ruman v. EskewIndiana Court of Appeals · 1975
- Superior Realty & Building Co. v. First National BankIndiana Court of Appeals · 1945
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Skalbania v. SimmonsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1982
- Force Ex Rel. Force v. Pierce City R-VI School DistrictDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1983
- Reeder Associates II v. Chicago Belle, Ltd.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2002
- American Cyanamid Co. v. StephenIndiana Court of Appeals · 1992
- Unnamed Members of the Class v. McMahonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1979
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.