Legal Opinion

Ruman v. Eskew

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided August 28, 1975No. 3-875A167PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellant Elizabeth Ruman, a female, was denied an opportunity to try-out for, and, if competent, to practice with the Varsity Tennis Team of Munster High School. Such denial was based upon Rule 9, § 10 of the Constitution and Bylaws of the Indiana High School Athletic Association (hereinafter referred to as the IHSAA) of which Munster is a member.

Section 10 reads as follows :

“G — Girls may participate, with or against, boys on interschool teams only when:
“(1) the school being attended does not have a girls [’] program in that sport and
“ (2) she follows the contest rules and season rules…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Virginia Petroleum Jobbers Ass'n v. Federal Power CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1958
  2. Haas v. South Bend Community School CorporationIndiana Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Bright v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Dewey R. Greene, Jr. v. Charles D. FairCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1963
  5. Leo F. Benoit v. Alfred GardnerCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1965

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Indiana High School Athletic Ass'n v. Carlberg Ex Rel. CarlbergIndiana Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Ruman v. EskewIndiana Court of Appeals · 1976
  3. IN High School Athletic Assoc. v. Jason CarlbergIndiana Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Indiana High School Athletic Ass'n v. Carlberg Ex Rel. CarlbergIndiana Supreme Court · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API