Legal Opinion

Yarmuth v. Government Employees Insurance

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided November 5, 1979No. [Misc. No. 3, September Term, 1979.]PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMurphy, C. J.

Pursuant to the Uniform Certification of Questions of Law Act, Maryland Code (1974), §§ 12-601 to 12-609 of the Courts and Judicial Proceedings Article, the United States District Court for the District of Maryland has certified for our consideration two questions of state law:

“(1) May an insurance company, under Maryland law, include a provision in an automobile insurance policy which would prohibit the recovery of uninsured motorist benefits under that policy where the insured’s claim admittedly exceeds $40,000 and where the insured has already recovered the sum of $40,000 under the…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Harleysville Mutual Casualty Co. v. BlumlingSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
  2. Bryant v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of Virginia · 1965
  3. Harthcock v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance CompanyMississippi Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Lyon v. Hartford Accident and Indemnity CompanyUtah Supreme Court · 1971
  5. Bell v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1974

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Erie Insurance Exchange v. HeffernanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
  2. Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. WebbCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1981
  3. Forbes v. Harleysville Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1991
  4. Waters v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1992
  5. Grimes v. Concord General Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1980

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API