Legal Opinion

Ford v. Russell

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided May 19, 1930No. 12,198PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJanvier, J.

Ford, plaintiff, seeks to recover from Russell, defendant, $640.60, of which $634.80 has been paid by him to Russell as installments on the purchase price of certain land formerly forming part of Poydras plantation in the parish of St. Bernard.

On August 3, 1921, a written contract was entered into under which Ford agreed to pay $2,912 for the land.

*391He paid $292 in cash and, for the balance, executed ten notes, each for $262, one payable each year for ten years.

Although the contract required only $262 to be paid each year, Ford had on July 11, 1922, paid to Russell a total sum of $634.80, and…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hitt v. HerndonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1927
  2. Brownson v. WeeksSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1895
  3. George v. KnoxSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1871
  4. Andrews v. HenslerSupreme Court of the United States · 1867
  5. Clover v. GottliebSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1898

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Dunseath v. HallauerWashington Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Bandel v. Sabine Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API