Hitt v. Herndon
Supreme Court of Louisiana
1Opinion of the Court
On Motion to Dismiss.
ST. PAUL, J.
Defendant herein took both a suspensive appeal and a devolutive appeal from a money judgment against him. Plaintiff moved below to dismiss the suspensive appeal on the ground that the bond given was insufficient. Within two days after notice thereof defendant filed an additional bond in a sum sufficient to supply the deficiency, all in accordance with Act 112 of 1916.
The motion to dismiss is renewed here, ‘the contention being that. Act 112 of 1916 has been repealed by Act 289 of 1926, which amends and re-enacts article 575 of the Code of Practice, and repeals…
2Cited by28 opinions
- State v. ReynoldsLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2000
- Neff v. Ford Motor Credit Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1977
- Tolbird v. CooperSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1962
- American Cyanamid Company v. Electrical Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
- Bank of New Orleans & Trust Co. v. BruleLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1980
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.