Legal Opinion

Cudahy Packing Co. v. Holland

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided March 30, 1942No. 245PublishedCited by 128 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Stone

Of the several questions raised by this record only one requires our attention: Whether under the Fair Labor Standards Act, 52 Stat. 1060, 29 U. S. C. § 201, et seq., the Administrator of the Wage and Hour Division of the Department of Labor has authority to delegate his statutory power to sign and issue a subpoena duces tecum.

On application of respondent, pursuant to § 9 of the Act, the District Court for Eastern Louisiana ordered petitioner to show cause why it should not be compelled to obey a subpoena duces tecum. The subpoena, issued by a regional director of the Wage and Hour Division, *359c…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Lowell Sun Co. v. FlemingCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1941
  2. Cudahy Packing Co. of Louisiana, Ltd. v. FlemingCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1941

3Cited by128 opinions

  1. Oklahoma Press Publishing Co. v. WallingSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. Guiseppi v. WallingCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1944
  3. Fleming v. Mohawk Wrecking & Lumber Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
  4. Perkins v. Endicott Johnson CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1942
  5. United States v. MinkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1956

123 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API