Legal Opinion

State v. Carisio

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided December 21, 1988PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CLIFFORD, Justice.

The defendant, Jean Carisio, appeals from a judgment of the Superior Court (York County; Brodrick, J.) entered on a jury verdict finding her guilty of manslaughter, Class B, 17-A M.R.S.A. § 203 (1983 & Supp.1987). Carisio contends that (1) the statutory definitions of “Recklessly” and “Criminal Negligence” are so vague as to render the Maine manslaughter statute unconstitutional; (2) she was denied her constitutionally protected right to a speedy trial; (3) the trial court erroneously found that her out-of-court statements were voluntary; and (4) the evidence is insufficient…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. State v. BarrySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1985
  4. State v. CrockerSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1981
  5. State v. BleylSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1981

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. State v. WilderSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2000
  2. Leonard B. Panther v. Lloyd F. Hames, Commissioner, Alaska Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
  3. State of Maine v. Kristina I. LoweSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2015
  4. State v. MichaudSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1991
  5. Despain v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1989

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API