Legal Opinion

Despain v. State

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided May 5, 1989No. 88-172, 88-196PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

URBIGKIT, Justice.

These two sequential criminal convictions present three questions considering rights to a speedy trial: time from arrest to date of trial (delay in prosecution); time from filing of information to date of trial (delay in district court trial); and delay in sentence after entry of a guilty plea (delay in sentencing).

We affirm, finding no error of procedural or constitutional dimension.

On April 6, 1987, with more than five years served on a 1982, ten-to-twenty year aggravated robbery sentence, appellant Robert W. DeSpain (DeSpain) was classified to a “trustee” position and…

2Cases cited55 opinions

  1. Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. United States v. MarionSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. United States v. LovascoSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. United States v. EwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  5. United States v. MacDonaldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. DeSpain v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Abitbol v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Jade Jewkes v. The State of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court · 2022
  4. DeSpain v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Despain v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1989

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API