Legal Opinion

Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'n v. Gillett

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 5, 1940No. Civ. 11169PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNourse, P. J.

The plaintiff sued upon a rejected claim presented to the executrices of the Estate of James N. Gillett, deceased. The claim was based upon a promissory note, secured by a deed of trust upon real property, payment upon which was long in default. The defendants rejected the claim upon the theory that, since the payee was required to exhaust the security before suing upon the original obligation, the claim presented to the estate was for money not then due. The plaintiff urges that the primary obligation became due upon its due date; that it was therefore necessary to present the claim and sue…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Zellner v. WassmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Brown v. Anderson-Cottonwood Irrigation DistristCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Maguire v. Hibernia Savings & Loan SocietyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Olszewski v. Scripps HealthCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Hatch v. Security-First National BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Zimmer v. GorelnikCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
  5. Ingram v. LIBERTY NATL. BANK & TRUST CO. OF OKLAHOMA CITYSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1975

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API