Marriott v. County of Montgomery

ORDER

HURD, District Judge.

By Memorandum-Decision and Order filed this date the plaintiff class was certified pursuant to Fed. R. Div. P. 23(b)(2) and 23(b)(3). It is appropriate in this matter to require that prospective class members be *134notified of the general legal issues involved and that their rights will be affected by-resolution of this case. See LaFlamme v. Carpenters Local #370 Pension Plan, 212 F.R.D. 448, 459 (N.D.N.Y.2003). While discretion may sometimes be exercised to permit opt-out rights to absent class members, this is not an appropriate case in which to do so. See id. Thus,…