Laflamme v. Carpenters Local 370 Pension Plan
District Court, N.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
*450 MEMORANDUM-DECISION and ORDER
HURD, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
Plaintiff, Michael LaFlamme (“plaintiff’), individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, filed a class action complaint against defendants, Carpenters Local #370 Pension Plan (“pension plan” or “defendants”) and the Board of Trustees of Carpenters Local #370 Pension Plan (“board” or “defendants”), alleging violation of the minimum benefit accrual provisions of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. §§ 1054(b).1 As is pertinent here, plaintiff seeks the following relief: 1) “[d]eclare…
2Cases cited49 opinions
- Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Oppenheimer Fund, Inc. v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Sosna v. IowaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- In re Fedex Ground Package System, Inc.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 2008
- In Re Fedex Ground Package System, Inc., Employment Practices LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2009
- In re Fedex Ground Package System, Inc., Employment Practices LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2012
- Marriott v. County of MontgomeryDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2005
- Pappas v. Metropolitan Police Department of the District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2024