Legal Opinion

United States v. Farley

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided July 15, 1997No. Criminal 90-00283-01PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

VAN ANTWERPEN, District Judge.

Defendant, David Farley, is a sentenced prisoner in federal custody who has filed a pro se Petition for Issuance of Writ of Error Coram Nobis Under 28 U.S.C. § 1651 and Motion Pursuant to Rule 52(b) Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure (Plain Error) filed July 10, 1997. As a threshold matter, we note that the defendant has filed at least two prior motions under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 and we do not believe the defendant can circumvent the certification requirements for second or successive motions under 28 U.S.C. § 2244 by merely labeling his motion as a…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. United States v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  2. Carlisle v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  3. Pennsylvania Bureau of Correction v. United States Marshals ServiceSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. United States v. Sammy CariolaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1963
  5. United States v. Alan R. StonemanCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Afiz v. BucknerDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2021
  2. Roper v. State of MissouriDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2021
  3. Roper v. State of MissouriDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 2021
  4. United States v. David FarleyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API