United States v. Farley
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
VAN ANTWERPEN, District Judge.
Defendant, David Farley, is a sentenced prisoner in federal custody who has filed a pro se Petition for Issuance of Writ of Error Coram Nobis Under 28 U.S.C. § 1651 and Motion Pursuant to Rule 52(b) Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure (Plain Error) filed July 10, 1997. As a threshold matter, we note that the defendant has filed at least two prior motions under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 and we do not believe the defendant can circumvent the certification requirements for second or successive motions under 28 U.S.C. § 2244 by merely labeling his motion as a…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- United States v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Carlisle v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Pennsylvania Bureau of Correction v. United States Marshals ServiceSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- United States v. Sammy CariolaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1963
- United States v. Alan R. StonemanCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Afiz v. BucknerDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2021
- Roper v. State of MissouriDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2021
- Roper v. State of MissouriDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 2021
- United States v. David FarleyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998