Legal Opinion
Priordale Mall Investors v. Farrington
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided September 8, 1987No. C1-87-225PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FOLEY, Judge.
Priordale Mall Investors (Priordale) appeals from a judgment dismissing its unlawful detainer action against respondents Donald Farrington, individually and d.b.a. Cottage Cleaners and Laundry (Farring-ton). On appeal, Priordale contends that the trial court erred in determining that its acceptance of rent constituted a waiver of past lease violations. We affirm.
FACTS
Priordale is a limited partnership which owns Priordale Mall (the Mall), a shopping center in Scott County. Through a series of assignments and subleases, Farrington became one of Priordale’s tenants in 1979…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Fritz v. WarthenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
- Kenny v. Seu Si LunSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1907
- Thomas Peebles & Co. v. ShermanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1921
- Gluck v. ElkanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1886
- Parkin v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Cloverdale Foods of Minnesota, Inc. v. SnacksCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1998
- Oak Glen of Edina v. BrewingtonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2002
- Westminster Corp. v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995
- Cloverdale Foods of Minnesota, Inc. v. SnacksCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1998