Legal Opinion

Westminster Corp. v. Anderson

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided August 29, 1995No. C4-95-409PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HARTEN, Judge.

Respondent landlord brought an unlawful detainer action alleging that appellant tenant, a recipient of section 8 housing assistance, materially breached the lease prior to August 1994. The district court referee granted restitution judgment for respondent but subsequently vacated that judgment, concluding that respondent had waived its right to terminate appellant’s lease by accepting housing assistance payments for the months up to, and including, September 1994. Upon review, the district court reversed the referee, concluding that the doctrine of waiver does not apply…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Frost-Benco Electric Ass'n v. Minnesota Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  2. Hubred v. Control Data Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
  3. Midland Management Co. v. HelgasonIllinois Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Parkin v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
  5. In Re Estate of SangrenCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1993

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. WOODRIDGE HOMES LTD. PARTNERSHIP v. GregoryCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010
  2. Premiere Mgt., L.L.C. v. NuttOhio Court of Appeals · 2010
  3. Hook & Ladder Apartments, L.P., Respondent, vs. Nichole Nalewaja, Appellant, John Doe, et. al., DefendantsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API