Legal Opinion

Richardson v. Clayton & Lambert Manufacturing Co.

District Court, N.D. Mississippi

Decided April 17, 1987No. Civ. A. EC 84-3-D-DPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION SUSTAINING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR NEW TRIAL

DAVIDSON, District Judge.

The instant action was tried before a jury and a verdict was returned for the defendant on July 30,1986. The plaintiff has now submitted a motion for a new trial based on several assertions of error. After a thorough and agonizing review of the facts of this case and the applicable law, the court is of the opinion that the jury instruction on assumption of the risk misled the jury and that a verdict based on this instruction combined with the other instructions given by the court will result in a…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Duncan v. Cessna Aircraft Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Nga Li v. Yellow Cab Co.California Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Tiller v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  4. Springrose v. WillmoreSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1971
  5. Jackson v. City of Kansas CitySupreme Court of Kansas · 1984

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Satcher v. Honda Motor Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1995
  2. Thomas R. Passarelli, P.C. v. BentleyFairfax County Circuit Court · 1995
  3. Satcher v. Honda Motor Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API