Legal Opinion
STATE (PUC) v. OK Transfer Co.
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided October 15, 1958PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWarner, J.
The State of Oregon, acting by its Public Utility Commissioner, 1 sought and obtained a decree enjoining the defendants, O. K. Transfer Company, a corporation, and A. L. Yincze, its president and manager, from certain transportation operations alleged to be in violation of its several permits issued by the Commissioner. From this decree the defendants appeal.
For convenience we will hereinafter refer to the plaintiff as “the Commissioner” and to the defendants as “the Company.”
The Company for sometime past was authorized under a Class A permit (ORS 767.135) to operate as a common carrier of…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- United States v. City & County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Hammerberg v. LeinertSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1946
- Entremont v. WhitsellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
- Lloyd A. Fry Roofing Co. v. WoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Roddy v. Hill Packing Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1943
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Thomas v. FoglioOregon Supreme Court · 1961
- Ackerman v. Tri-City Geriatric & Health Care, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1978
- Arizona State Board of Dental Examiners v. HyderArizona Supreme Court · 1977
- State v. Minnesota School of Business, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2017
- Anne Arundel County Ethics Commission v. DvorakCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2009
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.