Legal Opinion

Jenkins v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided December 18, 1991No. 598-90PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ON APPELLANT’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

MALONEY, Judge.

Appellant was convicted by a jury of delivery of a simulated controlled substance and sentenced to forty years confinement in the Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division. His conviction was affirmed on appeal. Jenkins v. State, 788 S.W.2d 677 (Tex.App.—Texarkana 1990). Appellant brought a petition for discretionary review to this Court. We granted appellant’s petition to determine whether the evidence was sufficient to show that he expressly represented the substance which he delivered to an undercover…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Boykin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
  2. Boykin v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1990
  3. Jenkins v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1990

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Grant v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1992
  2. Larry Samuel Palmer v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2007
  3. Stephen Dwayne Cannada v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2006
  4. Stephen Dwayne Cannada v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2006
  5. Stephen Russell Swilling v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API