Legal Opinion

Grant v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided January 29, 1992No. 251-91PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ON APPELLANT’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

2Per curiam

Appellant was convicted by a jury of delivery of a simulated controlled substance. After finding the enhancement allegations true, the jury sentenced appellant to fifty (50) years confinement in the Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division. His conviction was affirmed on appeal. Grant v. State, 802 S.W.2d 428 (Tex.App.—Ft. Worth 1991).

We granted appellant’s petition to determine whether the evidence was sufficient to show that he expressly represented the substance which he delivered to an undercover police officer to…

3Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Boykin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
  2. Boykin v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1990
  3. Jenkins v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
  4. Grant v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1991

4Cited by2 opinions

  1. Larry Samuel Palmer v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2007
  2. Stephen Russell Swilling v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API